When I think of the pattern mavens of
burda fash mag I see a solemn cabal of semi-priestesses (& maybe
priests) of impeccably clad stitchery who take it in strict turns to
fill the pages of the mag with the customary mix of the sublime,
the gorblimey and the frankly wtf.
|
secret burda maven meeting |
And I see them as each having their own
little kick in the gallop, their own idiosyncrasy, over and above the details from current
fashion trends. One of them likes patch pockets and one of them likes cowl
necklines and one of them likes folds that conceal welt pockets –
and rather like a logic puzzle all of those ones may even be the
same one. And so on.
And then one of them.... one of them
who only seems to get out for the odd frolic....one of them likes
pointy bits. Inset pointy bits. And likes to design them into
otherwise rather nice clothes.
|
random sample (hem) |
Now inset pointy bits, as we would all
admit if being honest, are the ultimate secret signal to other
sewists. Come on, do admit, you know it's true. Because they are so
hard to get right. And only a person pretty far gone into our funny
little world would even try to do them. Because – why? There are
no angles in, for example, an armpit. It's synclines and anticlines all the way through.
And hard to do + no particular benefit in doing = talking
to the cognoscenti.
And yet..and yet..sometimes those
tricky bits can be sooo good. I love a pointy sixties underarm
gusset. I made my first one in my early twenties from a vintage
pattern which I still have and love. There's just something so Avengers about them. And then
there are the situations where a dart turns into a princess seam, or
a pocket (another Burda maven fave) I love that too. I love the
pattern of the skirt I posted last year where a curved dart turns
into a pocket and then a pointy seam. I love it but it was such a
pain to do, and I mucked it up a treat.
This is particularly annoying as I tend
to wear it on the Saturdays that involve getting into a fabric shop,
where I waft around looking all “loving hands at home” and being
given even more side eye and blatant contempt by the quilting nuns
who seem to congregate in such stores. As if the standard amount I
get is not enough. But that's a story for another time.
For this is but a long and digressive
preamble to the meat of the matter, for I think. I hope.. that this
problem of execution of these natty details is now solved. A week
month or so ago I read a post from the Sewing Lawyer about her tip
for matching stripes from the front.
The technique is that you fold the seam
allowance under on the one piece, position it correctly on the other,
then zigzag along the seam line from the front. This tacks it in
place firmly and accurately, but you can still open out the
tacking so as to sew a proper wrong sides together seam.
A light bulb went off in my head. This
is the way to make pointy insets too. Or any other type of inset;
gusset; princess seam or dart, for that matter.
So in the interests of verifying my
assertions, and because I never met a sewing technique I didn't want
to try anyway, I thought I'd have a little go and report back.
|
something like this |
After making the skirt I mentioned above, I used
the pattern as a base for another skirt by reshaping the front middle
section into a semicircle; adding pleats and making the back match
the front (rather than being a coffin skirt). I never got around to
posting the test one I made, but I like it a lot and would like to
make a proper one, or two for winter. The back panel was quite
simple to construct because I used a narrow seam allowance, but I
wanted pockets at the front and this made the front panel a brain
folding nightmare.
So I decided to test my hunch by
remaking it, using the narrow seam at the back for comparison, and
see if tacking from the front would work in such cases. And get a
new skirt out of it, hopefully.
|
combined pattern on fabric with front at bottom of shot |
After much consideration, I carefully
selected a fabric from my stash which would work for my purposes.
But there it wasn't enough of it.
oh.
So, I added another experimental
parameter. How would this pattern go as a one seam skirt?
It's creative solutions and lateral
thinking like this that has made me the sewist I am - the proud owner
a of UFO pile visible from space.
|
skirt back with narrow seam | | | |
|
|
post tacking -wrong side - note sitting quite flat |
On the basis of this experiment I'm really excited to report that this
technique is a goer. It has awe-inspiring possibilities.
I'm less happy to report that the skirt at
this time is not - having run into a slight problem caused
rather amusingly by my urgent desire to try the new technique on a
real piece of clothing. Since I missed a couple of important pocket
fixing steps in my haste, it may never become a real thing at all.
But zig zag tacking from the top is the gas! It made the front seam,
with tricky wide allowances and pocket extensions, as easy as the
back seam with its quilt width seam allowance.
|
detail of sample showing pointy end -
tacking cut but not removed |
Just to test it in a range of applications I
also made a few samples (after the skirt, of course, what do you think I
am – methodical?).
|
Hopefully you can see that I'm having a little trouble folding in the end on this extremely pointy insertion |
Stitching quite pointy bits is not a problem.
Folding the end can be, but I think that this requires a technique
refinement rather than being a dealbreaker.
I'm sold! Thank you, Sewing Lawyer!
I also think that this could be quite a good fitting technique. But this post will never get up if I try that first.
So
I will stitch the pointy gussings
I will stitch them with no fussing
And I will stitch the inset sleeve
with an ease you won't believe.
I love, I love those little pointy
bits
now I know I won't have fits....
Though I do still think that armholes should be
rounded.